Polygenic Scores in Behavioral Genetics
Polygenic scores (PGS), also known as polygenic risk scores (PRS), are a method for quantifying an individual's genetic predisposition to a trait or disease by summing the effects of many genetic variants identified through genome-wide association studies (GWAS). In behavioral genetics, PGS are used to predict complex behavioral phenotypes, offering insights into the genetic architecture of traits like intelligence, personality, and mental health conditions.
Origins and Methodology
The development of polygenic scores (PGS) emerged from advancements in genome-wide association studies (GWAS), which became feasible with the completion of the Human Genome Project and the availability of high-throughput genotyping arrays. GWAS identify single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) — variations at a single position in a DNA sequence — that are statistically associated with a particular trait or disease in a population. While individual SNPs typically explain only a tiny fraction of the phenotypic variance for complex traits, the insight that many such variants, each with a small effect, collectively contribute to a substantial portion of heritability led to the concept of polygenic scores.
The construction of a PGS involves several steps. First, a large discovery GWAS is conducted to identify SNPs associated with a trait. For each SNP, an effect size (e.g., an odds ratio or beta coefficient) and a p-value are estimated. Second, these effect sizes are used to weight an individual's genotype at corresponding SNP locations. For example, if a particular allele at a SNP is associated with an increase in a trait (e.g., higher educational attainment), an individual carrying that allele will have a positive contribution from that SNP to their overall score. The sum of these weighted allele counts across many thousands or even millions of SNPs constitutes the individual's polygenic score. Different methods exist for weighting and selecting SNPs, such as pruning and thresholding (P+T) based on linkage disequilibrium and p-value cutoffs, or more sophisticated methods like LDpred and lassosum that account for linkage disequilibrium structure and prior effect size distributions.
Applications in Behavioral Genetics
Polygenic scores have become a powerful tool for investigating the genetic architecture of complex behavioral traits. They allow researchers to move beyond estimating heritability (the proportion of phenotypic variance attributable to genetic factors) to predicting individual differences based on measured genetic variation. This has opened new avenues for research across various domains:
- Cognitive Abilities: PGS for educational attainment and general cognitive ability have shown predictive power for academic achievement, socioeconomic status, and even health outcomes (Savage et al., 2018; Lee et al., 2018). These scores reflect the cumulative genetic influence on traits related to learning and cognitive function.
- Personality Traits: Research has begun to develop PGS for dimensions of personality, such as neuroticism and extraversion, providing insights into the genetic underpinnings of individual differences in temperament and behavior (De Moor et al., 2015).
- Mental Health Disorders: PGS have been developed for major psychiatric conditions like schizophrenia, bipolar disorder, major depressive disorder, and autism spectrum disorder. These scores can identify individuals at higher genetic risk for developing these conditions, although their predictive power for individual diagnosis remains modest due to the complex interplay of genetic and environmental factors (Maher, 2015).
- Gene-Environment Interaction: PGS facilitate the study of how genetic predispositions interact with environmental factors to shape behavior. For example, researchers can examine whether individuals with high PGS for a particular trait are more susceptible to certain environmental influences (Belsky et al., 2018).
- Evolutionary Psychology: While not directly measuring fitness, PGS can be used to investigate the genetic basis of traits that may have been under selection. For example, understanding the genetic architecture of cognitive abilities or social behaviors can inform hypotheses about their evolutionary history and adaptive significance. Some researchers explore whether PGS for certain traits are associated with reproductive outcomes or other fitness proxies in contemporary populations.
Limitations and Critiques
Despite their promise, polygenic scores face significant limitations and have attracted substantial critique, particularly regarding their interpretation and application.
Predictive Power and Missing Heritability
Currently, PGS explain only a fraction of the phenotypic variance for most complex traits, typically ranging from a few percent to around 20-30% for traits like educational attainment or schizophrenia. This indicates that a substantial portion of heritability, often termed
- Google Scholar: Polygenic Scores in Behavioral GeneticsScholarly literature; ranked by Google Scholar's relevance.
- BlueprintRobert Plomin · 2018Accessible introduction
This book provides an accessible overview of behavioral genetics, emphasizing the significant role of genetics in shaping psychological traits and introducing polygenic scores as a key tool for understanding individual differences. Plomin, a pioneer in the field, argues that DNA is the primary force shaping who we are.
- Behavioral GeneticsRobert Plomin, John C. DeFries, Valerie S. Knopik, Jenae M. Neiderhiser · 2016Canonical academic monograph
As a leading textbook, this work offers a comprehensive and rigorous treatment of the methods and findings in behavioral genetics, including detailed explanations of quantitative genetics, twin studies, adoption studies, and the emergence of molecular genetic techniques like GWAS and polygenic scores.
- The Genetic LotteryKathryn Paige Harden · 2021Recent synthesis
Harden, a leading behavioral geneticist, explores the ethical and social implications of polygenic scores and genetic differences for complex traits like educational attainment. She argues for a nuanced understanding of how genetic luck interacts with environmental factors to shape life outcomes, advocating for policies that promote equality despite genetic differences.
As an Amazon Associate, the Encyclopedia of Evolutionary Psychology earns from qualifying purchases made through these links. Book selection is editorial and is not influenced by Amazon. Prices and availability are determined by Amazon at time of purchase.
- Adaptationism and its criticsAdaptationism is the research program in evolutionary biology and psychology that seeks to explain traits as adaptations, products of natural selection designed to solve specific problems in an organism's ancestral environment. While central to much evolutionary inquiry, it has faced significant critiques regarding its assumptions and methodology.
- Adaptive LagAdaptive lag refers to the phenomenon where a species' evolved adaptations, shaped by past environments, become mismatched with novel or rapidly changing current environments. In evolutionary psychology, this concept is crucial for explaining why certain human behaviors or psychological mechanisms, once adaptive, may now appear maladaptive or lead to suboptimal outcomes in modern society.
- Adoption StudiesAdoption studies are a research methodology used to disentangle the relative contributions of genetic and environmental factors to phenotypic traits and behaviors. By comparing adopted individuals to their biological and adoptive relatives, these studies provide critical insights into the heritability of psychological characteristics relevant to evolutionary psychology.
- Animal Models in Evolutionary PsychologyAnimal models in evolutionary psychology involve studying non-human species to gain insights into the evolutionary origins, functions, and mechanisms of human behavior and cognition. This approach leverages the shared evolutionary history and conserved biological processes across species to generate hypotheses and test theories relevant to human psychology.
- Anne Fausto-Sterling's CritiqueAnne Fausto-Sterling is a prominent biologist and gender theorist whose work critically examines the biological determinism often associated with evolutionary explanations of sex and gender, advocating for a more nuanced understanding of their development through complex gene-environment interactions. Her critique emphasizes the social construction of categories like 'sex' and 'gender' and challenges reductionist views that attribute human behaviors solely to evolved biological predispositions.
- Behavior Genetics CritiquesCritiques of behavior genetics address methodological and conceptual challenges in attributing variation in complex traits to genetic and environmental factors. These criticisms are crucial for understanding the limitations and appropriate interpretations of behavior genetic findings within evolutionary psychology.